Larry Wolfe said:
.... Sorry dude, I obviously didn't see your post. If you want the credit, it's yours.....
...Well I've done RSC about four times now and I've had alot of ash every single time. I guess you're using the ashless Kingsford, cause the Kingsford I'm using produces ash. Gotta question for you SH, when you baste the RSC are you placing the lid back onto the cooker? I baste and put the lid back on, when I'm ready to baste again and take the lid off the chicken has alot of ash. No big deal, basting gets rid of it. So if you aren't replacing the lid everytime you baste then that would explain why you don't get ash. Or are you saying you do the chicken the same way as I've stated above and you're not getting ash? If so I find that hard to believe if we're doing it the same way, using Kingsford and I get ash and you don't?
Larry - about wanting the credit. Well ..... Yeah!... :grin: I mean, here I wus doing this great scientifical excrement, uh, experiment, and ....oh well, who cares. I was too sensitive.
About the ash. (Ash and ye shall receive I always say). I agree that we're not doing it the same way. Listen, the ash problem has to be in the basting. A dose of liquid in the pan will generate flying ash. I baste the chicken, just not with a lot of liquid. I don't put much liquid on my mop. I do put the lid back on when finished. I'm probably not basting as much as you are and perhaps with a lot less liquid. The final product, however, is terriffic.
Smokehouse